Insights Market Entry

The Product Compliance work that sets your Launch Date

Product compliance in Australia is decided by your product category, and the category determines which regulators you answer to. Establishing that at the start of an entry plan is what keeps a launch date intact.

JH
Jennifer Hansen
Founder, Retail Revolution Co
| 19 August 2026 | 6 min read

Product compliance in Australia is decided category by category, not by a single national approval. The category your product sits in determines which regulator you answer to, what testing you must hold, and what your packaging must carry. Establishing that at the beginning of an entry plan is what allows a launch date to hold.

The alternative is visible in the enforcement action currently on foot against the discount retailer Panda Mart, which is examined in the final section of this article. The allegations there have not been proven and the matters remain before the courts, so what follows describes regulator activity rather than findings of fact. It is instructive because almost every element of it was decidable before the first container was ordered.

The Regulators

Australia has no general safety provision. There is no single law stating that a business may not sell an unsafe product, and no single body that will clear a product for sale. Regulation proceeds standard by standard, and responsibility is divided between several agencies. Which of them you deal with is determined by what your product is.

The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission, known as the ACCC, is the national competition and consumer regulator. It administers the product safety standards, information standards and product bans made under the Australian Consumer Law, which is the national consumer protection statute contained in Schedule 2 of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010. It also coordinates the national recall system. Product safety standards are mandatory requirements applying to specified goods, covering both the physical product and the information that must accompany it.

State and territory Fair Trading agencies enforce the same Australian Consumer Law within their own jurisdiction. Each state and territory maintains one, titled either Fair Trading or Consumer Affairs depending on the state. These are the agencies that inspect premises, seize stock, issue public warnings and apply to courts for orders. A national brand is therefore subject to enforcement in every state in which its product is sold.

The National Measurement Institute administers Australia's trade measurement laws. Manufacturers, packers, importers and sellers of pre-packaged goods must ensure that packages are correctly labelled with a measurement marking and packer identification, and that the marking is accurate and excludes the weight of packaging material. The requirements extend to the position and format of the marking on the pack.

The Therapeutic Goods Administration, known as the TGA, regulates medicines, medical devices and other therapeutic goods. Products within its scope must generally be entered on the Australian Register of Therapeutic Goods before they may be supplied. Cosmetics and supplements sit close to this boundary, and whether a product falls inside it is determined by its ingredients and by the claims made for it.

Customs requirements are administered by the Australian Border Force. Certain imported goods must carry a trade description under the Commerce (Trade Descriptions) Act 1905, which is separate from and additional to the labelling required by the agencies above.

Electrical products introduce a further layer. Anything with a plug, a battery or an internal power supply is regulated by state electrical safety regulators as well as under the Australian Consumer Law, must carry the Regulatory Compliance Mark indicating that it meets the applicable Australian standard, and requires the responsible supplier to be registered on the national Electrical Equipment Safety System.

Most consumer products reach at least two of these agencies. Establishing which ones apply is the first task of an entry plan, because every subsequent cost and every subsequent date depends on the answer.

Product Labelling

Labelling is where the requirements become physical, and it is where the majority of enforcement activity is concentrated.

The obligations arrive from several sources at once. Information standards made under the Australian Consumer Law prescribe warning text for specified categories, including the wording, the placement and in some cases the size. Trade measurement law prescribes the measurement marking and packer identification. Electrical safety law prescribes the Regulatory Compliance Mark. Country of origin statements must be substantiated under the Australian Consumer Law, and a claim that a product was made in Australia carries a defined legal meaning rather than a general one.

Two characteristics of these requirements make them a scheduling problem rather than a design problem.

The first is that Australian requirements are made independently of their overseas equivalents. A product certified in Europe or Asia frequently satisfies an equivalent underlying safety requirement while failing the Australian wording or format. Existing certification is useful supporting evidence and it is not a substitute for testing against the applicable Australian standard.

The second is that labelling has to be designed into the artwork before production. Applying markings to landed stock requires handling, storage and rework, it is expensive, and in some categories it is not permitted at all. The cheapest point at which to correct an Australian label is before the print run.

The penalty record demonstrates how ordinary the affected products are. The Reject Shop paid $133,000 AUD and Dusk paid $106,560 AUD in May 2023 after the ACCC issued infringement notices for alleged breaches of the button battery safety standard. In 2024 Davie Clothing, the supplier behind the Oodie brand, paid more than $100,000 AUD over children's beachwear allegedly supplied without mandatory high fire danger labels, together with a court-enforceable undertaking. In 2025 Hungry Jack's paid approximately $150,000 AUD in relation to 27,850 button battery powered toys supplied without legally required warnings.

A product that is safe in fact can still be non-compliant in law. The warning text, the compliance mark and the supplier registration are separate obligations, and each is assessed on its own terms.

Who is responsible

Responsibility under the Australian Consumer Law is shared, and it is not transferred by the act of buying from an importer.

The law treats the manufacturer, the importer, the distributor and the retailer as suppliers. There is frequently more than one supplier responsible for the same product, regardless of position in the supply chain and regardless of whether the business is Australian or overseas. Consumer Affairs Victoria director Nicole Rich has stated the position plainly: under the Australian Consumer Law, retailers are responsible for the items on their shelves.

The supplier or importer bringing goods into Australia carries the greater part of the legal exposure. The retailer carries something separate and, in commercial terms, more difficult to repair. A recall or an enforcement action reaches the customer through the name above the shop door, not through the name on the customs declaration. The brand and the customer trust attached to it belong to the retailer, and a compliance failure damages both regardless of where in the chain the failure originated.

This has a direct consequence for a brand seeking listings. Your Australian retail customer carries liability alongside you, which means their buying and quality teams have a legitimate interest in your documentation before they commit to a range. A compliance file that can be produced on request is a commercial asset in that conversation, not merely a legal obligation.

What steps to take

The sequence below is short to describe and slow to complete. Several stages depend on parties outside the business, which is the reason compliance determines the launch date rather than following it.

Identify the category precisely. Obligations attach to what the product is and to what is claimed for it, rather than to how it is merchandised. A skincare product carrying a therapeutic claim and a skincare product without one are regulated by different agencies.

Establish which regulations apply to that category. The ACCC publishes the mandatory product safety standards, information standards and bans. Sector regulators publish their requirements separately. This stage produces a written list of the specific instruments applying to each product line, and every subsequent cost is derived from it.

Test against the Australian standard. The report must name the Australian instrument that applies. Overseas certification supports the case and does not replace it.

Design the markings into the packaging artwork. Warnings, compliance marks, measurement markings and country of origin statements belong in the artwork before production begins.

Complete the registrations. Electrical equipment requires responsible supplier registration. Therapeutic goods require inclusion on the Australian Register of Therapeutic Goods.

Document the mandatory reporting process. Suppliers must lodge injury reports with the ACCC within two business days of becoming aware of a reportable incident. A process created during an incident will not meet that deadline.

The consequence of postponing this work is currently visible in the market. Panda Mart, a discount retailer trading from three Australian stores, faces action from two Victorian regulators. Energy Safe Victoria has laid 130 charges under the Electricity Safety Act 1998 relating to lamps, power boards, adaptors, USB chargers and furniture with built-in power supplies, alleging non-compliance with mandatory electrical safety requirements, including items not carrying the Regulatory Compliance Mark. The regulator further alleges that the company was not registered as a responsible supplier on the Electrical Equipment Safety System when the products were offered for sale. Consumer Affairs Victoria separately laid 147 criminal charges, and in December 2025 the Victorian Supreme Court ordered two stores closed for 72 hours while inspectors removed non-compliant products. Reported findings included banned flammable candle holders, keychains containing button batteries, and flotation devices without mandatory warning labels.

The charges are allegations and have not been proven. What is not in dispute is the character of the requirements involved. A compliance mark, a supplier registration and a warning label are each settled at the design and sourcing stage, months before a store opens. Prior understanding of the categories and their requirements in Australia was available to be obtained, and the cost of obtaining it would have been a small fraction of the cost of the response.

130
Charges laid by Energy Safe Victoria over alleged electrical safety offences, including products supplied without the Regulatory Compliance Mark. Source: Energy Safe Victoria, January 2026

Common questions

What should a retailer do to come to Australia?

Identify the product category first, then establish which product safety standards, information standards and bans apply to it under the Australian Consumer Law. Confirm which regulators are involved, arrange testing against Australian standards, design the required markings into packaging artwork before production, and complete any registrations.

Why does compliance planning have to happen before entry?

Two stages govern the timeline and both depend on external parties: laboratory testing against the applicable Australian standard, and packaging artwork carrying the required markings. Neither can be compressed once manufacturing has begun, and correcting a label on landed stock is expensive and sometimes not permitted.

Does European or Asian certification satisfy Australian requirements?

No. Australian standards are made independently and frequently differ in detail from overseas equivalents, particularly on warning wording, label format and compliance marking. Existing certification is useful supporting evidence and does not replace testing against the applicable Australian standard.

Australia rewards the preparation

Australia is a demanding market to enter and a rewarding one to hold. It is wealthy, it operates in English, and its retail distribution is concentrated enough that a brand can achieve national coverage through a small number of accounts. The difficulty of entry is itself part of the return, because it limits the field to brands that have done the work.

Solid planning beforehand is what converts that difficulty into an advantage. The compliance work described above costs weeks and a modest budget. Completing it before an order is placed protects the launch date, the stock already paid for, and the buying relationship that a recall would damage.

Having somebody on the ground in Australia is what makes the process reliable rather than merely possible. Regulator conversations, laboratory arrangements, artwork proofs and pre-production sample checks are all faster to resolve locally, and category boundaries are frequently settled by discussion with the relevant agency rather than by reading a published requirement.

The starting point is a written map of the instruments that apply to your range. Every other cost, including the testing quote and the artwork brief, is derived from that one document. Our compliance service builds it before you commit to a production run.

JH

Jennifer Hansen

Founder of Retail Revolution Co. Her background covers 25 years in retail and 15 in senior leadership across sales, product range, operations, systems, store planning and marketing. Retail Revolution Co advises retailers in Australia and international brands entering the Australian market..

If this resonates, let's talk.

Whether you've got a specific challenge or you're just exploring what outside support could look like, we would love to have the conversation.

Book a free 30-minute call